Liberal “austerity and investment” budget plan unveils agenda for a massive assault on the Canadian working class

0
Liberal “austerity and investment” budget plan unveils agenda for a massive assault on the Canadian working class

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s unveiling of a ruthless austerity drive that will animate the coming budget has laid bare the reactionary character of his big-business Liberal government. Standing before reporters last Wednesday, Carney boasted that Canada would have “a budget of austerity and investment at the same time,” insisting this could be achieved “if we’re disciplined.” 

Behind this technocratic formulation from a lifelong servant of the financial oligarchy lies a ruthless plan: deep austerity for the working class while Ottawa shovels tens of billions into building up the military, expanding resource extraction, and shoring up corporate profits. The framework laid out by Carney is not a balancing act, as he portrays it, but sets the basis for a frontal assault on public services, social supports and workers’ living standards.

The attacks that lie in store for workers were illustrated by the government’s aggressive intervention against last month’s Air Canada flight attendants’ strike. The low-paid workers, many of whom work up to 35 hours a month without pay, were ordered back to work under the draconian powers of the Canada Labour Code by Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu. When the workers resisted, they were stabbed in the back by the union bureaucracy, with the Canadian Union of Public Employees’ top brass announcing a sellout deal—subsequently rejected by 99 percent of the rank and file—and ordering workers to immediately return to work.

In a July letter to cabinet ministers, Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne confirmed the initial details of the social spending cuts, outlining staged cuts of 7.5 percent of discretionary program spending beginning in fiscal year 2026-27, deepening to 10 percent the next year and then going up to 15 percent in the third year. This will affect department budgets—resulting in direct layoffs of civil service workers and contractors—as well as grants provided by the government to universities, cultural institutions and non-profits. 

Scientists and researchers have already sounded the alarm that the proposed 15 percent cuts to discretionary spending will devastate university research and basic science, undermining the capacity of society to meet the challenges of climate change, health crises, and technological development. 

The Liberals have previously stressed that transfers to the provinces and individuals would be shielded, but this is a sleight of hand. As many commentators have observed, the lion’s share of federal expenditures is tied up in these transfers which fund the country’s healthcare system, old age pension plan, employment insurance and other social programs; to carve out the savings demanded by Carney and the financial elite, far deeper cuts will have to be inflicted on social programs, public sector employment, and the very infrastructure of public life. 

While the population is told to tighten its belt, Carney has doubled down on Canada’s commitments to NATO’s rearmament drive. The government will not only reach the alliance’s 2 percent of GDP military spending target this fiscal year thanks to the 17 percent leap in defence spending the prime minister announced in June. Carney has signaled that his government is committed to NATO’s new 5 percent target, declaring it plans to reach it by no later than 2035, although this will require quadrupling the military budget from the government’s last spending estimates issued in 2024. This means hundreds of billions of dollars will be poured into fighter jets, warships, submarines, drones, and dual-use infrastructure in the far north Arctic, all justified in the name of confronting Russia and China. 

Carney has touted rearmament as a major economic boon, claiming massive military procurement and the development of “dual-use” critical minerals and transportation infrastructure will strengthen Canada’s military-industrial base and lead to jobs and economic growth. Thus, the “investment” side of his formula is nothing but a euphemism for militarization and corporate enrichment, to be paid for by slashing what remains of social spending.

link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *